|
| |
There are 43 guests and 0 MSX friends online
You are an anonymous user.
|
| | | | Saturday, July 30, 2005 - 19:49 Submitted by: Bazix Topic: MSX Revival | | Bazix have opened a One Chip MSX FAQ on their website, revealing a lot of new information on the One Chip MSX and taking away several uncertainties that existed on the One Chip MSX. Here, you can find an overview of the most important information that has been revealed: - The One Chip MSX will be configured as a special MSX1 computer by default, offering 256kB of RAM, MSX-MUSIC, MSX-DOS2 and FAT16 support
- The SD Card is hot swappable and can be accessed due to the implementation of a MegaSCSI interface in VHDL
- The VHDL code to achieve MSX1 compatibility will be included in the One Chip MSX package, together with a few other VHDL code examples
- The schematics to the One Chip MSX PCB will be included as well
- The FPGA core can be updated from MSX-DOS using a special MSX-DOS tool
- Configured as an MSX2 with MegaSCSI, MSX-MUSIC and SCC support, about 91% of the Logical Elements availabe are in use. The code to the implementation of Z80, MSX-MUSIC and VDP has however not yet been optimized to use as little Logical Elements as possible. All three cores can, by estimation, be optimized to use only 50% of the amount of Logical Elements from what they are using in the current development version
The One Chip MSX can be pre-ordered at Bazix from this page until August 20th, 2005.
Relevant link: One Chip MSX FAQ |
| | |
|
| By djh1697 on July 30 2005, 21:40 | I am not sure if this question has already being asked, but why does the one-chip MSX1 show the boot screen of MSX2, with 128k of VRAM? If Bazix was in to UK the company would be dealt with by trading standards for mis-leading advertising. The one-chip MSX1 only has 16k of VRAM, i don't understand ?
| | |
| By Ivan on July 30 2005, 21:57 | It also says "MSX Cartridge slot" while the picture of the PCB has 2 cartridge slots. My guess: it's the first "development" board with the almost finished MSX2 configuration.
You are right, this is not what is going to be sold. I hope that Bazix will update soon their page with pictures of the final design of One Chip MSX.
| | |
| By SLotman on July 30 2005, 22:06 | Bad, bad, bad... the only good thing was to see that VGA output works... but mono output, 91% of the FPGA taken, no MSX2 emulation, no keyboard and the case STILL to be chosen (common, how much time do they need to specify that?). And still the cable issue...
In my opinion for THAT price or the cable should be bundled or it should be MSX2, but as it is, at least for me, its not worth it :/
| | |
| By Ivan on July 30 2005, 22:07 | Supercharged MSX1... Nice!
| | |
| By snout on July 30 2005, 22:16 | djh: The picture shown is a prototype and is in no way misleading. MSX2 compatibility is not offered out-of-the-box, but will be offered in the future, as announced on the Bazix website several times
Slotman: 91% of the FPGA is taken in an MSX2 setup, which -by the way- does offer PSG, SCC and MSX-MUSIC in stereo. As stated on the Bazix website, the Z80 core, MSX-MUSIC core and V9938 can be optimized, saving many gates in the process.
As for the casing: it will be announced in the near future 
| | |
| By zett on July 30 2005, 22:29 | I think it's bad management.
they had to wait till the msx2 version was finished.
and looked like a computer, so like bult in keyboard.
| | |
| By Ivan on July 30 2005, 22:36 | I prefer it without mechanical parts. And you can choose the keyboard that fits your needs.
| | |
| By flyguille on July 30 2005, 22:59 | well... here will go my own preorder... but, before... when will I be asked to send the money? (date)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 30 2005, 23:01 | Indeed, no keyboard please. I'd rather buy a switchbox so I can use my PC's keyboard, mouse and TFT .. so much more choice..
| | |
| By timofonic on July 31 2005, 08:17 | long link (click on something on the up and go back, referer url stuff).
I prefer a lot more the eseMSX2 design, it's a lot smarter and thinking for UPGRADE! 1cMSX is unusable for me, MSX1 can be getted TOO CHEAP and even free (some friend that not uses it or even people that will go to the trash sadly).
| | |
| By sunrise on July 31 2005, 08:31 | Still waiting for an answer to know for sure if msx-audio/moonsound work(+12v/-12v issue)
As far as the info now is I can safely say that products of Sunrise will work with it, except for the Moonsound thus.
| | |
| By timofonic on July 31 2005, 08:48 | Too few information, people buying before knowing the machine? This is nosense, what occour? This revival is crap...
I have a moonsound...
| | |
| By Jorito on July 31 2005, 11:26 | Nice you decided not to buy it, timofonic. It's not so nice that you keep on nagging about it over and over again (after something like 10 similar posts in the same evening I think you made your point  )
| | |
| By tfh on July 31 2005, 11:43 | OMG... Is all that the MSX comunity can do these days? complain, complain and do some more complaining?
I have some doubts about the whole Bazix stuff too, but this FAQ they have made about the OCM is quite clear. But some people only read half of the news posting on MRC and start complaining, without actually reading the FAQ, or even carefully reading the news-posting...
Pfffff....
If you all know it so well, why not create your own OCM? Maybe then you will find out how hard it is to make something like that, market it and selling it.
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 12:48 | yeah.., reading properly is rare these days..
I suggest: wait until aug20 when we prolly know the final specs, and order it at 23:59, or don't order it at all.. but let's at least give the machine 1 chance..
(not propagandizing here orso, when the Moonsound doesn't work I won't be buying it)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 12:50 | Sunrise: I'm a complete hardware-n00b, but can the Moonsound be adjusted in any way when it turns out it doesn't work in the 1cm?
(a little soldering here and there or whatever )
| | |
| By snout on July 31 2005, 12:51 | Timofonic: The ESE MSX2 is the predecessor of the One Chip MSX, as you can read in the comments over here, the specs of the FPGA chips use are a lot more similar than they look at first sight.
About MSX-AUDIO and Moonsound: At the prototype I have at home they unfortunately do not function properly. CompactFlash, GFX9000 and Obsonet do. This is indeed caused by the lack of +12/-12V on the prototype. I'm not completely sure whether or not the final OCM will lack this as well. We would need an external 12V source or, of course, implement them in VHDL.... I'll find out whether or not the device will have 12V in its production version first.
flyguille: the e-mail address of Bazix is all over the Bazix site, you might as well have sent a mail. Provided 5,000 One Chip MSX computers are being pre-orderd, expect to make your payment shortly after the 20th of August.
| | |
| By Grauw on July 31 2005, 15:26 | Lack of 12V power would be a real shame. It seems relatively trivial enough to do, so I really hope this will be catered for. Users can ofcourse always mod their own lead to the 12V pins, but a even just having a connector for an external power supply would be preferable. Best would of course be to have the 12V out of the box.
With regard to the amount of logic gates used, I see that MSX-Music takes 28% of the gates, in other words, if I put my FM-Stereo-Pak in the cartridge slot I can have 30% more free FPGA space . Enough for some cool extensions, if you ask me! ^_^.
Anyways, I am really exited about all this. Keep it up, and I hope the 5.000 will be reached (and if not, that they will still manufacture it, perhaps by extending the order period or a slight price increase).
~Grauw
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 16:11 | Grauw: inserting an FM-Pac etc. *does* mean however that you rely on ppl *having* those extensions. If people don't have that and they wish for FM-Pac music then there's probably no FPGA power left for the custom things you had in mind for your game/demo (if you hit 100% with those )
One of the nice things about this 1cm is that a game (that uploads its own VHDL) can really be self-contained, without requiring anything else, maximum compatibility worldwide!
| | |
| By Latok on July 31 2005, 16:34 | Uhm......If the MSX scene wants the OCM, if MSXA wants the OCM, if Bazix wants the OCM, if ASCII wants the OCM.....Why on earth is there an August 20th deadline then. This really bugs me like hell, actually
Come on, just extend the deadline a bit, get some more final configurations (they now know what the scene wants) and give the marketing another boost with these final configurations.
Or is the world gonna end on August 20th? If that's the case, I haven't said a thing 
| | |
| By BodyHammeR on July 31 2005, 16:51 | Quote:
| inserting an FM-Pac etc. *does* mean however that you rely on ppl *having* those extensions. If people don't have that and they wish for FM-Pac music then there's probably no FPGA power left for the custom things you had in mind for your game/demo
|
Wolf_: Using the 1cm to play MSX games *does* mean however that you rely on ppl *having* MSX games that run on the 1cm.
(tm)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 16:53 | point being?
| | |
| By BodyHammeR on July 31 2005, 16:57 | Oh sorry, I forgot your message to Grauw had no point at all.
(tm)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 17:03 | explain please..
| | |
| By BodyHammeR on July 31 2005, 17:12 | Your message to Grauw:
Quote:
| inserting an FM-Pac etc. *does* mean however that you rely on ppl *having* those extensions. If people don't have that and they wish for FM-Pac music then there's probably no FPGA power left for the custom things you had in mind for your game/demo
|
Mine:
Wolf_: Using the 1cm to play MSX games *does* mean however that you rely on ppl *having* MSX games that run on the 1cm.
Meaning:
'Out of the box' the 1cm will only run cartridge-based MSX games. Not everyone has (all) their games on cartridge (there are still plenty of tape-freaks out there). So MSX freaks who don't own cartridges will have to go on the hunt for cartridges or do { whatever } to get their (tape/disk) games running on the 1cm.
Having the MSX-MUSIC already embedded is a great idea for those who don't own/care about it, but it also means there will be less room for future FPGA upgrades people are drooling about.
(erm, maybe it's just me, but I feel I've gone into parrot-mode here)
(tm)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 17:21 | Quote:
| Meaning:
'Out of the box' the 1cm will only run cartridge-based MSX games. Not everyone has (all) their games on cartridge (there are still plenty of tape-freaks out there). So MSX freaks who don't own cartridges will have to go on the hunt for cartridges or do { whatever } to get their (tape/disk) games running on the 1cm.
|
That's software, I was talking hardware.
Quote:
| Having the MSX-MUSIC already embedded is a great idea for those who don't own/care about it, but it also means there will be less room for future FPGA upgrades people are drooling about.
|
*that* was my point. Grauw was talking about freeing-up the FM-Pac code from the FPGA as he could plug his own FM-stereo-Pac, in order to gain some 30% power. If he was to make a game without FM-Pac code but with new stuff from himself which alltogether consumes 100% FPGA, but WITH support for FM-Pac music, then users without FM-Pac cartridge have no (FM-Pac)music.
So, the point was: eiter a normal MSX2 with FM-Pac or a boosted MSX2 without FM-Pac, but with a risc of not everyone being able to play it with music. That's the only thing I wanted to point-out.
and please cut the " (tm) " thing ... ^_^
| | |
| By BodyHammeR on July 31 2005, 17:25 | Okay, we'll blame these last few posts on 'not quite understanding each other' then.
(tm)
(yeah, just like you are going to stop with your )O_o)-thing)
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 17:30 | (^_^( "But we are no emotion-smileys!"
)o_O) "Most definitely not!"
(^_^( "So we aren't here to lighten-up a piece of text"
)o_O) "We 're just here to annoy everyone"
(^_^( "...."
)o_O) "Muhuahahaha"
| | |
| By mars2000you on July 31 2005, 18:12 | [(o )(o_O)(O_o)]/[(_^^)(__^)(^^_)]+[(OOo)(_OO)(__o)]/[(ooo)(OOO)(___)]
| | |
| By djh1697 on July 31 2005, 19:24 | I wonder if 1cm will with my MegaRAM, now that would be cool
| | |
| By Grauw on July 31 2005, 19:47 | But why would we all want the same machine? Because the 1 chip MSX can be modified (and I assume is modular), everybody can create their own configuration that suits their needs... If inserting an external FM-Pac means that I can have support for a super-shizzle-dizzle other extension, I’m all for it .
Of course, optimizing the code for space also sounds like a plan ^_^.
~Grauw
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 20:02 | Ofcourse, but wouldn't you want to create something and spread it so others can see/play it?
| | |
| By Edwin on July 31 2005, 20:31 | I'm quite happy to read the new information. Some of it is extremely positive to read. But I have some worries though.
The FAQ says that sources for msx1 compatibility will be included. That means that SCC/MSX-MUSIC/SD support and whatever is not strictly part of the msx1 standard will not be released?
Why does the MSX2 upgrade include a cable if the FPGA code can be upgraded from MSX-DOS? Btw, is there a price estimate for the upgrade and what about VHDL sources?
I find the lack of PAL support a bit worrying. It seems to me experienced VHDL coders could have added this in a really short time and it's a rather trivial feature for the European market. I find this rather odd and makes me wonder about ASCII's true devotion to the non-Japanese market. (And no, I don't have any NTSC capable monitors).
What signal is produced by the vga connector? I mean resolution/frequency etc. Just wondering about compatibility.
| | |
| By pitpan on July 31 2005, 21:06 | If you code a game for the 1CM that uploads its own FPGA core it can be really impressive. The question is therefore different: would that be an MSX game? Could it be run in the "other" MSX computers?
Or the 1CM will finally destroy the MSX compatibility?
| | |
| By wolf_ on July 31 2005, 21:09 | Which is something I wondered about from the very first moment.. "when is something not an MSX anymore?"
If you upload a complete C64 to the FPGA ... then what? The device is still calle one-chip-MSX then
| | |
| By djh1697 on July 31 2005, 21:13 | "Or the 1CM will finally destroy the MSX compatibility?"
It did with the lack of a cassette port!
| | |
| By Latok on July 31 2005, 21:14 | Uploading MSX-MUSIC, DOS2, different VDP's. It all sounds like a regular emulator. The difference is it all works way more accurate, right? It's much better than emulation? You can't tell the difference between a real MSX computer and the FPGA thing?
And pitpan, yes....of course.....But isn't that the whole issue? Does it HAVE to be MSX compatible? Can't we just use our real MSX machines for real MSX software? In essence, this isn't a One-Chip-MSX-Computer but a One-Chip-Computer. I don't mind at all, though. I like the concept.
| | |
| By snout on July 31 2005, 21:59 | I consider the worries on FPGA affecting the MSX standard to be 'fear of the unknown', more or less. Especially since you can always turn the One Chip MSX back into a real (original) MSX. Ideally, like Wolf stated, software adapting the FPGA will have a feature to turn the FPGA chip back in its original state. Does inserting an SCC, CompactFlash or GFX9000 interface in your MSX computer make it 'less MSX'? With the One Chip MSX, the OCM owners gain control on what the device is going to be capable of in the future, and yes these capabilities lie within adding features to the MSX, improving features to the MSX, implementing a completely different home computer or console, or even a new computer from scratch. What makes software using such VHDL alteration 'One Chip MSX'-software is the sole reason that it can be run on a One Chip MSX. We already had software exchangeability, now we have hardware exchangeability (of course, within certain limitations) as well. I think the upsides of gaining full control over the hardware far outweigh the potential downsides.
As for PAL support: the 21.48MHz the One Chip MSX FPGA core is running on makes it relatively easy to generate a 3.58MHz NTSC signal, while a 4.43MHz PAL color burst is quite a lot more difficult. I'm not sure whether it's hard or impossible, but it's a feature that won't be present out-of-the-box.
The VGA output has a resolution of 640x480, 31kHz at a refresh rate of 60Hz. As for the VHDL included: it will be the full VHDL code, including the MegaSCSI/SD support et al.
| | |
| By snout on July 31 2005, 22:01 | Latok: the difference between emulation and FPGA is, indeed, that FPGA can be made a lot more accurate easily, as you are re-creating the original hadware circuitry at hardware level. There's no OS, hardware or config you have to worry about, the OCM will do exactly what you program it to do. I must say it's quite nice to have a low-temperatore, no-cooler/fans needed, silent instant-boot device again, next to my turboR
| | |
| By Ivan on July 31 2005, 22:12 | Quote:
| As for PAL support: the 21.48MHz the One Chip MSX FPGA core is running on makes it relatively easy to generate a 3.58MHz NTSC signal, while a 4.43MHz PAL color burst is quite a lot more difficult. I'm not sure whether it's hard or impossible, but it's a feature that won't be present out-of-the-box.
|
All modern TVs support NTSC. My old 14" Sony TV supports NTSC and it is from 1988.
| | |
| By Latok on July 31 2005, 22:13 | I haven't seen a smooth scroll on any MSX emulator yet, I don't like emulators at all. I believe it all has to do with the timing or something, right? Someone tried to explain it to me once. 50hz/60hz, pc monitors etc. etc. Dunno. Anyway, it's reassuring I won't have these irritations with the OCM. Right, snout?! MSX demos on the OCM look, feel and sound EXACTLY the same as they do on real MSX machines?!?!?!
| | |
| By flyguille on July 31 2005, 23:54 | snout: and "short" can be ... after the 20th aug... within a month?
in other way.... the 1CM has RTC support?
| | |
| By Edwin on August 01 2005, 00:26 | Quote:
| while a 4.43MHz PAL color burst is quite a lot more difficult.
|
But which will have to be tackled for MSX2 support anyway to be able to get 50Hz. Either in PAL or NTSC.
Quote:
| The VGA output has a resolution of 640x480, 31kHz at a refresh rate of 60Hz.
|
This is not a particulary nice signal for fitting MSX displays. It basically has the same problems as the emulators do, different aspect ratio and large borders or scaling issues. And then I hope that the VGA signal is a conversion of the NTSC signal, otherwise there's a world of potetial trouble. Altogether this seems much more difficult than a simple PAL support.
Quote:
| As for the VHDL included: it will be the full VHDL code, including the MegaSCSI/SD support et al.
|
Check. This is rather important as you don't want to take a huge step back if you want to make some modifications.
| | |
| By Grauw on August 01 2005, 00:53 | Quote:
| All modern TVs support NTSC. My old 14" Sony TV supports NTSC and it is from 1988.
|
Through an RGB SCART connection, yes. Does it support NTSC through a composite video connection though? My widescreen TV does, but none of my monitors do, afaik. And given that the 1CM doesn’t have an RGB output (although yes I know it could be achieved through the VGA connector, a custom cable and a VHDL modification)
For RGB, the only real difference between NTSC and PAL is the resolution. For composite, there are a lot of additional differences like signal frequencies, the format of the colour signal, and who knows what else...
Quote:
| Ofcourse, but wouldn't you want to create something and spread it so others can see/play it?
|
I’m really really not enthousiastic about the concept of software tampering with my system hardware. It may sound nice in theory, but in practice I see various complications: 1. it might very well overwrite specific modifications such as the aforementioned RGB support that I have made, 2. I doubt that the devices are implemented modularly and can be added/removed individually, 3. I also don’t think the hardware can be changed on the fly. And I can probably think of many more reasons why it won’t work or why such things are not desirable.
So yes, I really like the concept of being able to change my system’s hardware by means of VHDL code. But no, I really really do not want software to touch it. I feel as uncomfortable about that as about software (e.g. a game) overwriting my Sunrise IDE BIOS with custom versions that they might desire.
~Grauw
| | |
| By tfh on August 01 2005, 07:37 | You guys should have mentioned the lack of a cassette port and a lack of sector-based floppies in the FAQ.
| | |
| By msd on August 01 2005, 08:43 | On no again remarks about the cas port. If you want to use tapes and never progress. Just stick to your msx1 and forget about the 1CM
| | |
| By Latok on August 01 2005, 08:49 | naaaa, tfh is just a cynical bastard
| | |
| By sunrise on August 01 2005, 21:19 | A slotexpander with external powersupply is a solution such as the sunrise or the expander of hans oranje, maybe padial's expansors also. But this is thus also the most expensive solution.
Plus the fact that it is unhandy to have two powersupplies
An extended print with some logic as used in our prototype for the gamereader is about 25 euro, but this had to be placed on an extra pcb together with a slotprint like a slotextender
The best solution is that MSX Association will do it straight away. Saves PCb costs.
| | |
| By Grauw on August 01 2005, 23:38 | Quote:
| Question @ Bazix: Are there other (multipurpose) ports for the user available? Really crazy freaks like me might want to "misuse" it and reimplement a casport
|
Yes, the 1CM overview page says:
"FPGA I/O pin (40 pins and 10 pins)"
You can also see those pins on the PCB. As far as I understand, those pins are general purpose and still unused, and you can create VHDL code which assigns functionality to them... So a cassette port mod shouldn’t be terribly difficult then.
~Grauw
| | |
| By poke-1,170 on August 02 2005, 02:14 | I suppose you can find those old cassette games online anyhow that y'all have on tape... I know it exists online anyway...
How else could I play games using blue msx?
Apart from that, tapes suck,most won't work anymore anyway and have you ever noticed how annoyingly long they load?
| | |
| By Tanni on August 02 2005, 10:33 | Quote:
| I suppose you can find those old cassette games online anyhow that y'all have on tape... I know it exists online anyway...
|
You also could have used cassettes to record your private programms, texts, etc.
Quote:
| Apart from that, tapes suck,most won't work anymore anyway and have you ever noticed how annoyingly long they load?
|
Yes, your're right, but to save the contents of these old tapes, we need a cassette port on the OCM! Also for nostalgy, too! And if it belongs to the standard, and if we want to be compatible, there must be a cassette port. To solve this problem, I think, for further MSX systems, there should be adaptors providing the cassette port facility.
| | |
| By Tanni on August 02 2005, 10:50 | Quote:
| All modern TVs support NTSC. My old 14" Sony TV supports NTSC and it is from 1988.
|
I don't have a modern TV! I don't watching TV anymore! Too much advertising, too many nasty things!
Just for MSX, I want to use my old TV, which looks very nice, compared to the new TV sets. So I hope
there'll be PAL support anyway.
| | |
| By wolf_ on August 02 2005, 11:09 | Quote:
| Yes, your're right, but to save the contents of these old tapes, we need a cassette port on the OCM!
|
No we don't. We have 'normal' MSX'es as well, don't we? Use your current MSX to backup those tapes then.. or is everyone throwing away their current MSX once they have a 1cm?
| | |
| By Tanni on August 02 2005, 12:54 | Quote:
| No we don't. We have 'normal' MSX'es as well, don't we? Use your current MSX to backup those tapes then.. or is everyone throwing away their current MSX once they have a 1cm?
|
Yes, we have ''normal'' MSX computers as well, but they are defective or will become defective sometime. Even so the tape recorders. All my MSX1 computers and my tape recorder are more or less defect. I don't have the equipment, the skills and the time to repair them and it would take some effort, time and money to send them to e.g. the Netherlands to get them repaired. So, for the long term, the best solution for all of us and for the integrity of the standard would be to have PAL and CAS port on OCM as well.
| | |
| By karloch on August 02 2005, 16:45 | I think that tapes will become defective much sooner than your MSX1 or tape recoder. You can play tape games on the 1CM through the LOADCAS utility from Martos.
| | |
| By Tanni on August 02 2005, 17:18 | Quote:
| I think that tapes will become defective much sooner than your MSX1 or tape recoder. You can play tape games on the 1CM through the LOADCAS utility from Martos.
|
Yes, maybe! Is it possible to reconstruct tape contents with that utility?
| | |
| By wolf_ on August 02 2005, 17:19 | ..if it is, would you then be less picky about not having a cas port on the 1cm?
| | |
| By Tanni on August 02 2005, 18:44 | Am I the one who is picky about not having a CAS port? There are others much more complaining about it! It's not a question of being picky, but of MSX philosophy.
| | |
| By POISONIC on August 02 2005, 19:13 | 133,6 1chip msxés per per day is needed to reach the 5000 pre order
5,5 1chip msxés per hour is needed to reach the 5000 pre order
what hapens if they only have lets say a 3500 pre order on 20-8-05 is the project doomed then?
| | |
| By POISONIC on August 02 2005, 19:47 | about the cas port an usb device would do the trick a relais+usb chip a pcb dont ask me how but it is possible
| | |
| By SolidEric on August 02 2005, 19:52 | POISONIC, I think they're gonna produce anyway......Nishi buys the rest himself
| | |
| By flyguille on August 02 2005, 20:01 | oh!, so nishi is a rich guy?... he needa 150e x 2500 atleast 375.000 euros!
| | |
| By SolidEric on August 02 2005, 21:33 | you think he isn't?
| | |
| By Latok on August 02 2005, 21:56 | That would be AWESOME. Nishi dragging himself to his pc pre ordering 2500 units of the OCM  Good stuff
| | |
| By POISONIC on August 02 2005, 22:01 | in japan failing is not an option..... i
| | |
| By SolidEric on August 02 2005, 22:14 | I agree POISONIC, that ocm will be produced!
| | |
| By POISONIC on August 02 2005, 22:23 | if nishi has 454734 euro's
| | |
| By karloch on August 02 2005, 22:58 | Quote:
| Yes, maybe! Is it possible to reconstruct tape contents with that utility?
|
Yes, it is. Take a look here.
| | |
| By Tanni on August 03 2005, 10:48 | That's not what I thought about! The threat you linked to deals with saving files from a CAS-image-file to a real cassette recorder, if I understood it correctly. My intention was having a tool to read corrupted tapes via CAS port and saving it to disk or whatever for further reconstruction. The need for CAS port support on OCM is mainly for accessing and reconstructing tape contents to save it to a more recent storage media.
| | |
| By BiFi on August 03 2005, 12:24 | The cassette thing has nothing to do with TFH's cynism. Most MSX1 games were released on cassette in those days and some cartridge programs (both MSX1 and MSX2) save things to cassette. The 1CM is called fully MSX1 compliant, but it does lack the cassette port. And yes, we all know about all those games were ported to disk later, but that's no reason to just not add a cassette port anymore.
| | |
| By wolf_ on August 03 2005, 12:40 | Price might be a reason..
I doubt most ppl are willing to pay 'extra' for some stone-age connector that eventually no-one will use, and is just there to satisfy some nittpickers who prolly won't use the cas-port themself even! Besides, use your current MSX for that. It's almost as if everyone wants to play cas-games on that 1cm again as soon as the 1cm is released ..
But I bet the turbo R, which has no cas-port but wears the 'MSX' logo, is a blasphemious machine as well then..
It's almost as if some ppl don't want the 1cm (in it's current state) to be a succes, and look for minor every detail to doom it..
| | |
| By Tanni on August 03 2005, 12:53 | Quote:
| ... And yes, we all know about all those games were ported to disk later, but that's no reason to just not add a cassette port anymore.
|
You could have used the tape to save your own stuff like selfwritten programms, both in MC or BASIC, or private texts or so! That's also worth to be saved on recent media, I think!
| | |
| By wolf_ on August 03 2005, 14:32 | grauw wrote:
Quote:
| So yes, I really like the concept of being able to change my system’s hardware by means of VHDL code. But no, I really really do not want software to touch it. I feel as uncomfortable about that as about software (e.g. a game) overwriting my Sunrise IDE BIOS with custom versions that they might desire.
|
What about adjusting the 16 msx1 colors? As a developer who wants his own colors, you need to store that bit o' VHDL somewhere, inject your own colors and run. Restore that VHDL upon quit..
Think Nemesis III (those suns).. and yes, that's MSX2, but it's just an example, with adjusting RGB values yourself this works on MSX1..
| | |
| By boukichi on August 03 2005, 15:13 | there is a new news.
MSXA has decided to release "MSX2 version up kit" in the same day which OCM release day.
the cost of this kit is 3000yen(tax out).
| | |
| By Thom on August 03 2005, 15:24 | Quote:
| MSXA has decided to release "MSX2 version up kit" in the same day which OCM release day.
the cost of this kit is 3000yen(tax out).
|
What's your source?
3000 yen = about $27. That's not too much.
About the tape, I don't think it's okay to stick 100% to the MSX standard for the sake of it. Tapes are obsolete anyway, it won't hurt to get rid of it.
| | |
| By iamweasel on August 03 2005, 16:25 | What comes with this MSX2 up kit?
Just the V9938 or there are new hardware available or even modifications that improve the hardware already available?
| | |
| By Tanni on August 03 2005, 18:31 | Quote:
| Price might be a reason..
|
Because it's a fan product, the price might not be such a reason.
| | |
| By Leo on August 03 2005, 18:49 | I dont understand why there is a charge for MSX2 kit , I thought iwas not ready so they could only provide MSX1 code file. If they have MSX2 working why dont they offer it to hte 5000 first to roder it could be a motivation to reach the number ... They prefer to sell less OCM and then charge some of the customers why additional 27$ ... strange commercial habit ...
| | |
| By SLotman on August 03 2005, 19:48 | I keep saying, if the OCM was for that price, being MSX2 and with cable, I for once wouldnt complain about the price, and I believe the sales would be much higher.
But now, $27 for a CD-ROM with MSX2 VHDL code that you can get at ESE site? I wonder what ASCII thinks about the IQ of MSX community...
| | |
| By flyguille on August 03 2005, 20:13 | paying again for the CD upgrade SUCKS!
PIGS!
| | |
| By Grauw on August 03 2005, 22:51 | I’m sure I’ll manage to free another €22 ^_^.
I’m glad that progress went so fast that they will have the upgrade available immediately! Let’s hope that further upgrades however (VHDL space optimisation / v9958?) will be free...
~Grauw
| | |
| By Thom on August 04 2005, 08:50 | Quote:
| paying again for the CD upgrade SUCKS!
PIGS!
|
Inappropriate behaviour, dude.
| | |
| By SolidEric on August 04 2005, 13:55 | I agree Thom, I know it's said before, but if you only complain then don't buy it!!!! And what flyguille said is not done!!
| | |
| By snout on August 04 2005, 14:22 | About the tape support: As the RCA connectors can, by implementing an AD converter in VHDL, be used as audio inputs I think it's only a matter of time before someone releases an update that uses one of the RCA connectors as mono audio output and the other RCA connector as an audio (cassette) input.
About the MSX2 support: Instead of assuming the worst, as usual, how about waiting for Bazix to make an announcement on the MSX2 update, look at the price and contents of that package and then draw your conclusions? How about looking at it from the bright side for a change, as now even the most sceptic person can not deny that the One Chip MSX is -at least- capable of bringing MSX2 compatibility out of the box. It's just a thought, of course, but then again: some people really have trouble showing even the slightest bit of patience and optimism and I suspect quite a few of those to have based their opinions on feelings that have nothing to do with the One Chip MSX itself and/or assumptions that have not even remotely been based on facts.
| | |
| By snout on August 04 2005, 14:24 | By the way: (just in case): I'm glad to see that -at the end of the day- there are only a few people that fit the lack of patience&optimisim I described above ^_^
| | |
| By flyguille on August 04 2005, 15:16 | no, snout, it is tooooo unfair.... the upgrades (just the info must be free) and in a public FTP if it can........ now if then... they release an optimization to save atleast 30% LEs with the same features.... I will pay that.... surely everybody will no complain about that.... but, the 1CM already is being selled as a MSX capable of MSX2.... and the only reason not to release it with MSX2 is because it is not finished or has bugs... now all we knows the trust ... it is because they want to do extra money... nothing more!
that is a looot unfair
| | |
| By flyguille on August 04 2005, 15:18 | and WHAT WILL DO BAZIX? ,,, buy ONE CD... and copy it for all its customers?.... jajajajajajaj
I am so upset!!!!!
| | |
| By flyguille on August 04 2005, 15:20 | Quote:
|
Quote:
|
paying again for the CD upgrade SUCKS!
PIGS!
|
Inappropriate behaviour, dude.
|
and what you waits?... the "not free upgrade news" is shocking.... everybody surelly thought that... but I expressed that!
| | |
| By flyguille on August 04 2005, 15:26 | as i said before
"if I was delaying my preorder just because i needs to have the money first.... now i see more FAR to buy the 1CM..."
i was decided to buy... but just delaying for having enought spare money... now i needs to re-thinks again about this investment.
| | |
| By Thom on August 04 2005, 15:46 | Quote:
| and what you waits?... the "not free upgrade news" is shocking.... everybody surelly thought that... but I expressed that!
|
Unfortunately, you chose to express that in a plain aggressive way. Like you should know as a mature father, this "technique" to voice your opinion is extremely weak. Shouting, forcing, calling names ("PIGS" won't help you any further at all. Not only here, but everywhere in the civilization. Generally, aggresive discussion won't be taken seriously. I'm not sure if that's what you want but my suggestion would be to comfort yourself to a more constructive, well-considered style. Then people won't feel as much resistance and may be actually willing to listen. It's easy, really.
| | |
| By flyguille on August 04 2005, 17:20 | Sure Thom, I normaly not behave in that way... you knows
But that was a special ANGRY moment!
and worth to speak with special ANGRY words!
| | |
|
|
| | |
