Author
| Errr? Anyone?
|
dhau
msx master
Posts: 1040 |  Posted: May 24 2004, 18:14 |
Well, let's think:
MSX-DOS 1.x is a MS-DOS 1.x clone
MSX-DOS 2.x is a MS-DOS 2.x clone
Windows 3.0 was a GUI on top of MS-DOS 3.30
Windows NT is a follow-up to Windows 3.0
XBOX have a micro-kernel made on base of Windows NT kernel!
You see? If we look for similarities between MSX and PS2, CG and XBOX, XBOX is the most close thing!
|
|
snout
msx legend
Posts: 4991 | Posted: May 24 2004, 19:56 |
Euhm. I don't think MS-DOS 2.x had subdirectories ;P
|
|
dhau
msx master
Posts: 1040 | Posted: May 24 2004, 20:21 |
Umpstz... Well, I only started my PC usage in 1991, so it was MS-DOS 3.30 on cheap Taiwan knowoffs from IBM PC XT 
So then:
MSX-DOS 2.x is a MS-DOS 3.x clone |
|
sjoerd
msx addict
Posts: 442 | Posted: May 25 2004, 00:37 |
Quote:
| Euhm. I don't think MS-DOS 2.x had subdirectories ;P
|
Ofcourse msdos 2 had subdirectories. |
|
|
|
|
