Author
| Has anyone ordered a 1 chip MSX ?
|
snout
msx legend
Posts: 4991 |  Posted: August 18 2005, 12:27 |
That analogy would only be correct if MSX would be the raincoat, the suitcase would be the out-of-the-box OCM and 'I' would be the potential of the One Chip MSX, but I doubt you intended it that way ^_^
|
|
jltursan
msx professional
Posts: 886 | Posted: August 18 2005, 12:41 |
But there's something new after all...the VGA output is a nice addition. Supossedly is finally working, isn't it?
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 12:53 |
Quote:
| Quote:
| Zett: With the OCM, you can modify your MSX system in a way you like. You can learn VHDL and something about reconfigurable hardware. That's the future
|
and i think thats not a good idea.
in a few years evry body got tere own msx onw disign and all diffrent then it's more a pc and then tere will bee needed a virtual maschine.
this idea is olso used on diffrent open source soft ware.
the same problem there. everybody makes there own version.
|
There's still MSX Association! The users will code new features, but -- at least -- MSX Association has to accept it as MSX! That's why the MSX community and MSX Association should work together. At least there must be standardisized interfaces, beyond them, the users can do their own coding without violating the compatibility. |
|
legacy
msx professional
Posts: 516 | Posted: August 18 2005, 13:19 |
Quote:
| this idea is olso used on diffrent open source soft ware.
the same problem there. everybody makes there own version.
|
That's not necessary
Think about Linux , Open MSX and Iirlicht.
Iirlicht is a open source real time 3d renderengine.
Take a look at iirlicht, and you'll be surprised.
|
|
zett
msx addict
Posts: 282 | Posted: August 18 2005, 13:24 |
k
but is there a case now for the msxone??
I think the biggest problem is that the are selling a product what isn't finished
|
|
zett
msx addict
Posts: 282 | Posted: August 18 2005, 14:54 |
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:22 |
Quote:
| I think the biggest problem is that the are selling a product what isn't finished
|
When, do you think, this kind of produkt is finished? |
|
zett
msx addict
Posts: 282 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:26 |
Quote:
| Quote:
| I think the biggest problem is that the are selling a product what isn't finished
|
When, do you think, this kind of produkt is finished?
|
When the keep up creating it like the do now.never
I look at it like this.
a product don't matter what hobby or pro. is finished when you kan put it on a shelf in da shop.
a product white casing info boxed.
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:31 |
And, when do you think MSX -- as a product -- is finished?
|
|
zett
msx addict
Posts: 282 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:34 |
tanni learn to read
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:37 |
It's hard to read what you've written! First, I meant the OCM, second, I meant the whole MSX standard!
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:39 |
Do you think the MSX standard will sometimes be finished? From some point of view, you also can consider it as a product!
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 15:40 |
It's probably not my point of view.
|
|
Leo
msx freak
Posts: 238 | Posted: August 18 2005, 16:01 |
normally one recognize an msx at first sight no need for a definition.
from my point of view , what lacks is in the OCM to be a true MSX
is its own keyboard : i mean with a PC keyboard it does not look
like much to a MSX ...
For the rest MSX1/2/2+ , i have no doubt some will available for
this upgrades...
|
|
Tanni
msx addict
Posts: 303 | Posted: August 18 2005, 16:09 |
Quote:
| normally one recognize an msx at first sight
|
Yes! Should also hold for new MSX products, if possible!
Quote:
| no need for a definition.
|
???
Quote:
| from my point of view , what lacks is in the OCM to be a true MSX
is its own keyboard : i mean with a PC keyboard it does not look
like much to a MSX ...
|
Yes, totally agree! |
|
|
|
|
