SymbOS MSX multitasking operating system - help needed! (Development MSX Forum)MSX Resource Center MSXdev 2008 - MSX1 development bonanza!              
              
English Nederlands Español Português Russian         
 News
   Frontpage
  News archive
  News topics

 Resources
   MSX Forum
  Articles
  Reviews
  Fair reports
  Photo shoots
  Fairs and meetings
  Polls
  Links
  Search

 Software
   Downloads
  Webshop

 MRC
   Who we are
  Join our team
  Donate
  Policies
  Contact us
  Link to Us
  Statistics

 Search
 
  

  

 Login
 

Username

Password




Don't you have an account yet? Become an MSX-friend and register an account now!.


 Statistics
 

There are 45 guests and 4 MSX friends online

You are an anonymous user.
 

MSX Forum


MSX Forum

Development - SymbOS MSX multitasking operating system - help needed!

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 Next Page )
Author

SymbOS MSX multitasking operating system - help needed!

Prodatron
msx master
Posts: 1109
Posted: June 22 2006, 01:44   
After connecting my VG8235 via Scart or RF to different monitors/TVs I got the feeling, that the aspect ratio in screen mode 6 (512x212) is not 2:1 but maybe 1,5:1 or even less. On my big 16:9 TV it even looks like 1:1! (very wide screen format )
Do I just have the wrong monitors or is it true?
Prodatron
msx master
Posts: 1109
Posted: June 22 2006, 01:51   
Quote:

It's fairly easy to get a Panasonic MSX2+ or turboR as well. They're just a little more expensive. ...



Thanx for the hints. Ok, really not cheap but I will think about it!
manuel
msx guru
Posts: 3450
Posted: June 22 2006, 10:02   
Philips and Sony MSX2's are practically the only ones that were sold in Europe.

Anyway, I haven't tried yet if the 2nd drive really works with SymbOS. But congratulations on your 8250 Does it have extra RAM?
jltursan
msx professional
Posts: 873
Posted: June 22 2006, 10:33   
Quote:

There's two turboR's on ebay.es right now, worth every penny



Ahem.....the first one is a bit overpriced, isn't it? . The second one is very interesting; but the TR comes together a lot of software that maybe you don't want.
spl
msx professional
Posts: 738
Posted: June 22 2006, 11:41   
Quote:

After connecting my VG8235 via Scart or RF to different

monitors/TVs I got the feeling, that the aspect ratio in screen mode 6

(512x212) is not 2:1 but maybe 1,5:1 or even less. On my big 16:9 TV it

even looks like 1:1! (very wide screen format )
Do I just have the wrong monitors or is it true?



Yesterday's photo:

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/6479/s36000228yu.jpg

Today's photo:

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/6451/s36000066pg.jpg

it looks very very good


Yours,

Salva
PingPong
msx professional
Posts: 988
Posted: June 22 2006, 11:58   
Quote:

After connecting my VG8235 via Scart or RF to different monitors/TVs I got the feeling, that the aspect ratio in screen mode 6 (512x212) is not 2:1 but maybe 1,5:1 or even less. On my big 16:9 TV it even looks like 1:1! (very wide screen format )
Do I just have the wrong monitors or is it true?



UH? on 4:3 monitors msx does not have a 256/192. = 1.33 asp. ratio or 2.66 at high res?
[D-Tail]

msx guru
Posts: 3018
Posted: June 22 2006, 13:59   
PingPong: MSX does have a 256/192 resolution mode. Simply reset the right bit (7) with

VDP (10) = VDP (10) and 127 This will change the y-resolution from 212 to 192. Set it again with OR 128.
PingPong
msx professional
Posts: 988
Posted: June 22 2006, 14:45   
Quote:

PingPong: MSX does have a 256/192 resolution mode. Simply reset the right bit (7) with

VDP (10) = VDP (10) and 127 This will change the y-resolution from 212 to 192. Set it again with OR 128.



I know this, thx, my question is only on the aspect ratio: if msx had 1.33:1 aspect ratio,
-plotting an orizzontal line made up of 45 pixels (not line command 45 pset commands)
-plotting a vertical line made up of 45 pixels (not line command 45 pset commands)

should show like two box lines of == length. As i remember this was in sc2,4,5,8
in hires modes, the width is half the height. That's all

Prodatron
msx master
Posts: 1109
Posted: June 22 2006, 15:56   
This is what I mean:

http://www.symbos.de/files/symbos16-9.jpg

The ratio seems to be close to 1:1 as it looks nearly like on the CPC.
On SPLs pictures it seems to be more close to 2:1.
msd
msx professional
Posts: 612
Posted: June 22 2006, 16:13   
The ratio also differs between 50 en 60 hz. On 60Hz the height is much bigger than with 50Hz. It differs 50 lines on the total screen. (not the visable part)
Prodatron
msx master
Posts: 1109
Posted: June 22 2006, 16:49   
Quote:

The problem then becomes finding a board with a big enough FPGA chip on it, not to mention all the connectors you'll need. I've seen boards that look 'ideal' enough to make an MSX out of, but none of them have anything near the amount of LEs needed to make an MSX2+. The OCM was already on the small size with 12k LEs. Finding something bigger seems almost impossible, unless you're willing to spend 500 eurii on a board, which most people aren't.



What's about this one?

http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?Language=English&CategoryNo=39&No=83

It even has 20.000 LEs! And Altera writes, that it will be a "low-cost" board. Sounds like the price will be <200$, as the "powerful" version of this board is about 270$.
msd
msx professional
Posts: 612
Posted: June 22 2006, 16:57   
I mean the 212 lines are spread out over a lager area. Making the visable area bigger on 60Hz and therefore the ratio is changed.
diederick76
msx user
Posts: 63
Posted: June 22 2006, 19:45   
Well, this version works better at my setup (Philips VG-8235 with double sided drive and Sunrise IDE). I finally get to see it for myself and am very much impressed. However: it only recognizes 576K of the RAM, which is half of what I have.


spl
msx professional
Posts: 738
Posted: June 22 2006, 21:24   
Quote:

This is what I mean:

http://www.symbos.de/files/symbos16-9.jpg

The ratio seems to be close to 1:1 as it looks nearly like on the CPC.
On SPLs pictures it seems to be more close to 2:1.



Have you tried Symbos MSX in a NON 16:9 monitor or TV? I've tried in my TV and yes, it looks like you have seen in my monitor, which is a C=1081.

Yours,

{mod: removed double post}
Prodatron
msx master
Posts: 1109
Posted: June 23 2006, 17:58   
@Diederick76: Because of its CPC origin currently 576K (64K+512K) is the maximum amount of supported Ram. I am thinking about increasing it to 1MB or 2MB, but more than 2MB is not possible, as the current ram config is always stored as an 8bit value.

@SPL: Yes, right, on a 4:3 the ratio is more like 2:1. Just funny to see, that the MSX is perfectly prepared for 16:9
 
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 Next Page )
 







(c) 1994 - 2008 MSX Resource Center Foundation. MSX is a trademark of MSX Licensing Corporation.