Author
| Most essential MSX event (1982-2005) megapoll [nominations]
|
Latok msx master Posts: 1734 | Posted: September 17 2006, 19:58   |
We already have the last one, right?
|
Reply LOCKED |
snout
 msx legend Posts: 4992 | Posted: September 17 2006, 20:05   |
Bussum 2006 and openMSX 1.0 are events from -after- 2005 and are therefore invalid nominations. Sorry :/
|
Reply LOCKED |
Latok msx master Posts: 1734 | Posted: September 17 2006, 20:08   |
So that makes 1420....uh.....1421 worthless posts  |
Reply LOCKED |
ro msx guru Posts: 2347 | Posted: September 18 2006, 09:17   |
nom: Japan software houses
why: For all the great games
|
Reply LOCKED |
wolf_
 msx legend Posts: 4781 | Posted: September 18 2006, 22:32   |
judgement day, ppl .. if you want to nominate another MSX landmark event.. do it now  |
Reply LOCKED |
Edwin msx professional Posts: 626 | Posted: September 18 2006, 23:16   |
Why isn't openmsx 1.0 valid? Oh wait, 2005, I thought that said 2050.
/me thinks he should avoid the next fair
Nom: The release of the Amiga
Why: It united the msx scene (mostly to bitch about it ;-) |
Reply LOCKED |
wolf_
 msx legend Posts: 4781 | Posted: September 18 2006, 23:57   |
After the deadline closes I'll split-up sunrise into magazine, gameproduction, hardware ... these are so different (but all are important) they're worth mentioning on their own,
|
Reply LOCKED |
snout
 msx legend Posts: 4992 | Posted: September 18 2006, 23:59   |
then another request of mine: Zandvoort -> Zandvoort + Tilburg MSX fairs?
|
Reply LOCKED |
wolf_
 msx legend Posts: 4781 | Posted: September 19 2006, 00:00   |
yeah I'll split the major fairs as well
|
Reply LOCKED |
wolf_
 msx legend Posts: 4781 | Posted: September 19 2006, 00:04   |
well, guess time's up..
|
Reply LOCKED
|
|
|