MSX easier to emulate than C64? (Emulation MSX Forum)MSX Resource Center               
              
English Nederlands Espa�ol Portugu�s Russian         
 News
   Frontpage
  News archive
  News topics

 Resources
   MSX Forum
  Articles
  Reviews
  Fair reports
  Photo shoots
  Fairs and meetings
  Polls
  Links
  Search

 Software
   Downloads
  Webshop

 MRC
   Who we are
  Join our team
  Donate
  Policies
  Contact us
  Link to Us
  Statistics

 Search
 
  

  

 Login
 

Username

Password




Don't you have an account yet? Become an MSX-friend and register an account now!.


 Statistics
 

There are 52 guests and 3 MSX friends online

You are an anonymous user.
 

MSX Forum


MSX Forum

Emulation - MSX easier to emulate than C64?

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next Page )
Author

MSX easier to emulate than C64?

dvik
msx master
Posts: 1344
Posted: October 13 2006, 01:53   
Quote:

dvik, also the c64 had fixed palette.


Yeah I vaguely remember that. I haven't done any c64 coding in over 20 years. But as wolf_ said, the palette isn't as clear as the MSX palette which makes it better at least for some type of games.
AuroraMSX

msx master
Posts: 1264
Posted: October 13 2006, 10:12   
Here's a desrciption of the VIC-II, the C-64's vdp.
sinus
msx user
Posts: 34
Posted: October 15 2006, 16:32   
Talking about C64:
I was just having a glance at some pictures on the net and I found something I don't like to see...

http://www.msxposse.com/site/gallery/displayimage.php?album=2&pos=40

I don't know how to understand this picture, still it looks like someone hammering a C64 at an MSX fair!!
I just hope that I am misunderstanding and that there is a good explanation for this. C64 is nothing special to me but it certainly is for some other people that should be respected.
I don't want to be polemic but I hope this machine has not been voluntarily destroyed in some kind of 'anti-C64 ritual'... Ok, this is just a machine, just like a hammered MSX would be, still it would simply be a real shame! I am sure a majority of people in this community would disapprove such an act.
Still, this picture is on a public site, there should be at least an explanation that goes along with it... or some appology to the C64 community.
PingPong
msx master
Posts: 1026
Posted: October 15 2006, 16:55   
Quote:

Talking about C64:
I was just having a glance at some pictures on the net and I found something I don't like to see...

http://www.msxposse.com/site/gallery/displayimage.php?album=2&pos=40

I don't know how to understand this picture, still it looks like someone hammering a C64 at an MSX fair!!
I just hope that I am misunderstanding and that there is a good explanation for this. C64 is nothing special to me but it certainly is for some other people that should be respected.
I don't want to be polemic but I hope this machine has not been voluntarily destroyed in some kind of 'anti-C64 ritual'... Ok, this is just a machine, just like a hammered MSX would be, still it would simply be a real shame! I am sure a majority of people in this community would disapprove such an act.
Still, this picture is on a public site, there should be at least an explanation that goes along with it... or some appology to the C64 community.



Only a very frustrated peoples can do things alike this...
dvik
msx master
Posts: 1344
Posted: October 15 2006, 19:23   
I have to agree with sinus. That dude on the picture is a big fat asshole. I guess the poor c64 was not working to start with but still...

EDIT: I don't know who that guy on the picture is so I can't really say that it is an a-hole, but at least the action is one that big fat a-holes would do.
BodyHammeR
msx addict
Posts: 489
Posted: October 15 2006, 19:48   
The C=64 was (afaik) not working indeed.

This is a physical re-enactment of the 'traditional' C=64 bashing as seen in several MSX demos in the 1990's.
dvik
msx master
Posts: 1344
Posted: October 15 2006, 19:55   
Quote:


Still, this picture is on a public site, there should be at least an explanation that goes along with it... or some appology to the C64 community.


I think the pictures should be removed and post an apology somewhere. This is shameful for the MSX community and something I definitely don't want to be part of.
wolf_

msx legend
Posts: 4781
Posted: October 15 2006, 20:05   
It was discussed on MRC shortly after the Oss fair, also with mixed reactions. Some ppl thought it was bad, others compared it to crashing an old printer orso, or an old unused MSX1, and didn't make such an issue about it.
Xan0ri
msx lover
Posts: 125
Posted: October 16 2006, 08:50   
Hammering old computers is just stupid.
It's okay for me to joke about C64 users (+ others scenes), and for C64 users (& others) to make fun about us MSX users.
..But it when it comes to this, we need to apologize about the "incident". It's just wrong.

Sorry, C64' ers.


ro
msx guru
Posts: 2347
Posted: October 16 2006, 09:22   
Don't be a tightass. it's just damn funny smashing them C64 or anything else (even MSX stuff). Every-one thinks it's funny at the moment it happens, but afterwards it's always blablabla.
it's always funny untill some-one gets hurt, then it's just hilarious.

c' mon! Anybody got a problem with that philips MSX printer I threw in the garbage last week? (now, THAT's horror!)
(oh, I've got this monochrome monitor, still working, which is of no use to me... any one?)


--------
So uh, bot?
I just love ANY homecomputer, even commodore. Hell, I got a c64 and amiga stacked in the attic which I loved. Also an atari 520 a speccy (zx81) and a BBC computer. I used to have a texas instrument, but sold it waaaaay back. (damn, that's bad.)
MSX still is my favorite tho.
AuroraMSX

msx master
Posts: 1264
Posted: October 16 2006, 13:52   
Quote:

Hammering old computers is just stupid.

True, but making such a big fuzz about it is imho even worse... Come on, we're talking about a piece of non-functioning (*) electronic equipment, which would have gone to the garbage anyway.

(*)Yes, I was there; no, I didn't bash the C64; yes, I do think it was funny.

Quote:

a speccy (zx81)


/me slaps ro about a bit with a C64... (Ow, wait, no, that's wrong. Can't hurt them C64. Sorry.)
A speccy is not a zx81!
Latok
msx master
Posts: 1734
Posted: October 16 2006, 14:06   
It would be a great compliment if C64 users start bashing MSX systems at their fairs!!!! I would jump with joy
ro
msx guru
Posts: 2347
Posted: October 16 2006, 14:12   
zx spectrum... speccy... no? wasn't SPECTRUM / sinclair the brand ? no?
well it was a zx81 for sure... like this:

AuroraMSX

msx master
Posts: 1264
Posted: October 16 2006, 14:15   
Quote:

zx spectrum... speccy... no? wasn't SPECTRUM the brand? no?


No
[edit]Ah, editing after posting eh? Sinclair was the brand, zx80, zx81, spectrum, QL (and others?) the models[/edit]
ro
msx guru
Posts: 2347
Posted: October 16 2006, 14:17   
ah, I get it. it's like MSX1 and MSX turbo R....
zx81 or zx spectrum.


my mistake...
 
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next Page )
 







(c) 1994 - 2008 MSX Resource Center Foundation. MSX is a trademark of MSX Licensing Corporation.