One Chip MSX postponed (Revival MSX Forum)MSX Resource Center               
              
English Nederlands Espa�ol Portugu�s Russian         
 News
   Frontpage
  News archive
  News topics

 Resources
   MSX Forum
  Articles
  Reviews
  Fair reports
  Photo shoots
  Fairs and meetings
  Polls
  Links
  Search

 Software
   Downloads
  Webshop

 MRC
   Who we are
  Join our team
  Donate
  Policies
  Contact us
  Link to Us
  Statistics

 Search
 
  

  

 Login
 

Username

Password




Don't you have an account yet? Become an MSX-friend and register an account now!.


 Statistics
 

There are 42 guests and 2 MSX friends online

You are an anonymous user.
 

MSX Forum


MSX Forum

Revival - One Chip MSX postponed

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page )
Author

One Chip MSX postponed

[D-Tail]

msx guru
Posts: 3020
Posted: September 16 2007, 22:29   
Quote:

and where do you get the roms and or software.

I think I know this one ;-)
Edwin
msx professional
Posts: 626
Posted: September 16 2007, 23:38   
Personally I think it should have been produced locally from the start. I only see advantages there. Not in the least that Sunrise would actually care to produce something like that in a reasonable amount of time. I don't think the priority for a western edition is very high in Japan. The long time since the Japanese version seems to pretty much confirm that.

By the way, I'll get my 1brickMSX back to a 1chipMSX again once my jtag is up and running. But I've been a bit too busy to focus on that really.
Hydlide
msx lover
Posts: 83
Posted: September 17 2007, 09:33   
Quote:

Again, both off topic, the question is do we want an european version rohs compliant and available with slots
Not again questioning the content(s)



well, RoHS compliancy is not a question, it's a must.

and regardless who makes the OCM, the final product should be a finished *product*, not a tie-wrapped board with cables etc sticking out. And it needs slots, or at least one slot.

if Sunrise can build one locally under MSX-a license, maybe even as "OEM" partner for Basix, it could be a nice prospect for future evolutions..
QuinnTheEskimo
msx user
Posts: 37
Posted: September 17 2007, 09:44   
Considering all the electronics coming to Europe from Asia every day, creating a RoHS compliant product shouldn't be impossible.
MicroTech
msx lover
Posts: 122
Posted: September 17 2007, 10:06   
IMHO local production of ocm is a great idea/solution!
I sponsor this option
A question: is it possible to "route" preorders at bazix to sunrise?
(maybe my English is by far not perfect)
sjoerd
msx addict
Posts: 450
Posted: September 17 2007, 11:50   
I would buy one.
ivke2006
msx novice
Posts: 25
Posted: September 17 2007, 12:52   
yep, I would buy one too.

But I am under the impression that Bazix doesn't see Sunrise as a option. I don't know that for sure but that's just my feeling.

Why not make (also) the licenses, design + software available for other partners like Sunrise or even multiple local partners? I think this could also speed up 'evolution' of the OCM. like more or less slots, bigger FPGA chip, VHDL upgrades, etc..So people can choose between a super deluxe version or a normal OCM.
multi
msx lover
Posts: 67
Posted: September 17 2007, 13:04   
i guess obtaining an license to build an (new) msx computer should not be too difficult, this is the idea msx grew big on right? every company can build a compatible machine. of course you have to pay a royalty fee for using the rom's, but as i understood the hardware is open source, without the roms being obtainable for producing this open source hardware it would be kinda like an empty guesture to make the hardware open source. i can't imagine msx changed to a machine only a few elite can build and sell....
Hydlide
msx lover
Posts: 83
Posted: October 12 2007, 14:04   
can we have a word on the status of the EU OCM? Will we see the OCM/eu in 2007 or not? If not, why not, and when will it be expected then?

Or maybe bazix will surprise us all with an enhanced OCM with MSX2+ support (or better)..

but at least, give an update!?
manuel
msx guru
Posts: 3545
Posted: October 12 2007, 16:27   
Better send a mail to Bazix about this and post the reply here!
wolf_

msx legend
Posts: 4780
Posted: October 12 2007, 16:31   
Iirc there's no news to report tho:
1) it'd have been posted on the MRC frontpage bigtime
2) iirc someone asked Rikusu @ Bussum .. ergo: no news
manuel
msx guru
Posts: 3545
Posted: October 12 2007, 18:46   
It would be nice to know *why* there is no news. Are things stalled? If so, why? What is the expected date of an update?
Rikusu

msx professional
Posts: 958
Posted: October 12 2007, 18:53   
So far, things didn't go very smoothly concerning the OCM, as you all know. That's one of the reasons why we have made the choice not to disclose every detail that we get to know ourselves. Nothing feels as annoying as to continuously say things without 100% certainty and then to have to take them back again because things turn out differently.

As for an expected date of an update, I can say something about that, but with the necessary prudence: January 2008. The reason is simple: I will be visiting Japan from half December through the first week of January. I already made a 'date' with our Japanese partners to talk some things through...

But please do remind, I/we can't give any guarantees on this point.
Hydlide
msx lover
Posts: 83
Posted: October 12 2007, 18:59   
Quote:

Better send a mail to Bazix about this and post the reply here!



I'd not do that without any permission actually, since I feel it's not fair to quote privately addressed emails.

but yeah, I guess I'll also send bazix an email. although rikusu already answered most of our concerns.
wolf_

msx legend
Posts: 4780
Posted: October 12 2007, 18:59   
So, how about the -often heard- suggestion to produce those OCM's locally instead of in the far east?
 
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page )
 







(c) 1994 - 2008 MSX Resource Center Foundation. MSX is a trademark of MSX Licensing Corporation.