Author
| Looking for software that gives emulators a hard time
|
wolf_
online
msx legend
Posts: 4779 |  Posted: March 29 2003, 19:20 |
When there are numerous alternatives already, then ok, but when there's not much choice yet ..
|
|
snout
msx legend
Posts: 4992 | Posted: March 29 2003, 19:21 |
well... Meridian 3.0 is an its way!  |
|
wolf_
online
msx legend
Posts: 4779 | Posted: March 29 2003, 19:59 |
well for practical reasons, an msx can't emulate 640k mem in the opl4 when it has only 128k, a pc can!
|
|
GuyveR800
msx guru
Posts: 3048 | Posted: March 29 2003, 21:40 |
Seems a bit overkill to buy a PC that can when you can just add 512K for a couple of euros  |
|
wolf_
online
msx legend
Posts: 4779 | Posted: March 29 2003, 22:43 |
I wouldn't buy a pc for that, I have one already. So that's not an arguement for 99.99% of the users.  |
|
GuyveR800
msx guru
Posts: 3048 | Posted: March 29 2003, 22:46 |
Emulating an OPL4 with 18 FM channels, 24 wave channels in stereo is quite a hefty task for the majority of PC's people have at home. Only a relatively small percentage of PC users has anything faster than 300 MHz.
Getting off-topic though...
|
|
manuel
msx guru
Posts: 3545 | Posted: May 04 2003, 14:36 |
Quote:
| For the Turbo-R capacities, don't forget the Swiss demo of Mi-Chi !!! Some parts are a real nightmare for the best emulators (openMSX and NLMSX) ....
|
Well, try it! It runs almost perfectly on openMSX. There are some problems caused by incorrect emulation of the TurboR's FDC and some minor problems with the scrolling. But it's almost perfect otherwise |
|
|
|
|
