MSX2 + SymbOS + Cheap LCD = MSX3 = the perfect OLPT (General discussion MSX Forum)MSX Resource Center               
              
English Nederlands Espa�ol Portugu�s Russian         
 News
   Frontpage
  News archive
  News topics

 Resources
   MSX Forum
  Articles
  Reviews
  Fair reports
  Photo shoots
  Fairs and meetings
  Polls
  Links
  Search

 Software
   Downloads
  Webshop

 MRC
   Who we are
  Join our team
  Donate
  Policies
  Contact us
  Link to Us
  Statistics

 Search
 
  

  

 Login
 

Username

Password




Don't you have an account yet? Become an MSX-friend and register an account now!.


 Statistics
 

There are 41 guests and 3 MSX friends online

You are an anonymous user.
 

MSX Forum


MSX Forum

General discussion - MSX2 + SymbOS + Cheap LCD = MSX3 = the perfect OLPT

Author

MSX2 + SymbOS + Cheap LCD = MSX3 = the perfect OLPT

elopes
msx friend
Posts: 4
Posted: September 07 2008, 06:02   
Wow! That's what I have to say after see some movies on Youtube of a MSX2 running SymbOS. This is truly amazing.

I not a die hard MSX fan (though I enjoyed it 20 years ago), but this system was brought to my memory after read about recent difficulties of OLPT (One Laptop Per Child) project, specially due high costs to run Linux (memory, solid state disk etc) and the new (?) idea of a couple MIT researchers to recreate OLPT project based on 8bits computers after a trip to India where they saw a NES-like home computer been sold for just US$12.00 (twelve dollars!) in some city streets.

I know that would be extremely hard to sell a laptop for US$12.00. Even the Indian machine does not have a screen, just a standard TV output connection, but I wonder what would be the final cost to have SymbOS running on some MSX2 with a LCD screen and a wifi connection (this is what I call MSX3). Final specs would be something like:

1MB RAM
4 GB (SD card)
Wi-Fi connection
SymbOS software
LCD screen (MSX2 high resolution mode) (maybe some kind of e-Paper)
Zilog eZ80 CPU 20MHZ with TCP/IP support
PS2-style Keyboard
1 USB port
2 AA battery powered!

We are talking about several millions of computers to be sell to third-world governemnts. Such scale could make parts costs very competitive, huh?

Anyways, I think MSX2 standard is a much better candidate than NES-like computers to create an educational computer. MSX software library is still awesome (compilers, educational soft, etc) and over the years amazing software has been developed as well (browsers, MP3, MPeg players, FTP etc).

Links:
http://www.symbos.de/
http://www.insidetech.com/news/2791-mit-students-build-12-pc-based-on-nes
http://revolv.in/2008/03/15-computer-in-india.html
http://www.zilog.com/products/family.asp?fam=218

Come people, lets see this as an opportunity to relive a legend! Post your comments and ideas. Maybe someone (Nishi, where are you man? This is the chance that you may waiting for) could create a prototype to show to some government...

Regards, Emerson


Edwin
msx professional
Posts: 626
Posted: September 07 2008, 12:31   
It's probably not quite as simple. Cost is not so much determined by the age or low complexity of a system, but by simple production volume. The OLPC is quite a lot more powerful than an MSX2. But since it should be able to access the internet, it really needed that power. With the current state of websites, you're just not going to get away with a 20 MHz z80 and a TV resolution display.

Also, SymbOS is a very nice system, but it's not complete yet for daily usage. It's going to need a lot more applications. Which brings you to the main issue, what should a machine be able to do to get potential market of many millions. After you figure that out, you can determine whether an MSX2 (or NES for that matter) based PC has any chance of succeeding. Personally, I don't see anything like that happening without proper internet access. Which pretty much discounts either option.
Latok
msx master
Posts: 1734
Posted: September 07 2008, 12:54   
elopes, Nishi has been involved in the OLPC project. He probably has brought up the MSX concept as some kind of basis. Maybe it's not even a coincidence you connected the OLPC with your MSX memories. Still, I don't see it happening anymore the MSX concept will somehow lead to a new OLPC-computer. We've passed that phase and it didn't happen.
elopes
msx friend
Posts: 4
Posted: September 07 2008, 13:30   
Hello,

You are right about connectivity, that's why I've put eZ80 in the specs. Take a look in its specs. It has built-in TCP/IP capabilities (including web server with cgi processing).

Regards, Emerson

PS: I mean OLPC, not OLPT (it was a kind of joke with brazilian Workers Party (PT in portuguese), the Brazil's president party who is interessed in OLPC project).
elopes
msx friend
Posts: 4
Posted: September 07 2008, 13:48   
BTW, MSX disappeared because its market disappeared in first place. We are not talking about to sell computers to people that can spend US$200 or US$ 2000 for a computer. We are talking about to sell millions of machines directly to governments so they could give it for free to students whom does not have enough money to buy a notebook. A window-like computer for US$25 would make a difference (forget about US$100 or US$200, it will not happen).

OLPC so far is a massive failure. besides that, it does not seem inspired by projects like MSX (which stablished a formal standard, so anyone could produce a compatible machine). It is a one-stop shopper approuch (they make the specs, they produce the machine and they sell it, no room for innovation - again an outstanding point to MSX). I think the idea here would be to create the specs. Hopefully, it will attract people who want to make money by making a machine compliant with defined standard.

BTW: I'm not advocating the idea to create a computer to connect to a TV. I think it HAS to be mobile (from classroom to room at home).

MIT is moving in this direction. The point is that the machine they selected as a model does not have anything like SymbOS. MSX does!

Edwin
msx professional
Posts: 626
Posted: September 07 2008, 15:35   
Just because MIT is experimenting with it, doesn't mean there is a real market. Especially with internet connectivity it's probably not going to work. It's not because of the connectivity itself, it's about rendering web pages. An average webpage already contains more than 1MB of data. After decompressing images that will increase to several MB. Ploughing through that requires a bit more than an 8 bit cpu with 64k of address space.
elopes
msx friend
Posts: 4
Posted: September 07 2008, 20:41   
Sorry, I cannot agree with you simply because such machine would not be used by people like you and me. This is to be used by third world students, to allow them to access email, forums, FTP servers, email and tailor made web content such as education oriented websites (there are thousands of lightweight websites like that). Maybe wikipedia, but not youtube (though I believe SymbOS could handle such content).

Another point is that eZ80 can address up to 16MB of RAM, so machine specs could be easily updated to something like:

8MB RAM
4 GB (SD card)
Wi-Fi connection
SymbOS software
LCD screen (MSX2 high resolution mode) (maybe some kind of e-Paper)
Zilog eZ80 CPU 20MHZ with TCP/IP support
1 USB port
2 AA battery powered!

Cheers

 
 







(c) 1994 - 2008 MSX Resource Center Foundation. MSX is a trademark of MSX Licensing Corporation.