One problem with asMSX is that it uses "[]" instead of "()". Apart from other differences. I think it does not support macros.
The sjasm v0.42c, is perfect.
One problem with asMSX is that it uses "[]" instead of "()"
True, but you can toggle to "()" with the ".zilog" pseudo-op.
Apart from other differences. I think it does not support macros
No, it does not. That's a pity.
I use "Edit Plus 3" to write the code. Doing "Find Replace All" changes the "[" by "(" instantly.
I'm in love with sjasmplus, mainly because it works with whatever syntax you throw at him. Easy to port legacy code from other assemblers.
Another vote for sjasmplus here.
At first I had problems with something in sjasmplus expected syntax, I guess it was about the labels (but don't remember now) and sd_snatcher helped me with that.
After that, my relationship with sjasmplus is only happiness.
