Casio fixed their PV-7 misdoings in the later MX-10, but only on the MX-101 they seem to have reached the same level as the PV-8 in clean design and cost effectiveness to produce.
PV-7 Is the first design, it has single-sided PCB, 8KB RAM, and DIN5 Cassete output, requires FA-32.
I think PV-16 Is the PV-7 redesign, it has double-sided PCB, 16KB RAM, and DIN8 MSX Standard cassete output.
I have MX-10 black and red in hands, and also MX-101. MX-10 red and black are the same inside.
I don't have an MX-15, but I think it is just the MX-10 modified for PAL video, as it seems to have been sold in Spain:
The MX-101 also has 16KB of RAM and DIN5 nonstandard cassete interface. Plus the RF transmitter.
Just found that HX-33 works with serial interface of HX-22...
Yes, your red MX-10 seems to have the same board I knew from this site:
But from the MSX Village pictures, the MX-101 seems to have a different board, more modern, single sided and probably with an S3527 MSX-Engine:
Just found that HX-33 works with serial interface of HX-22...
So the HX-33 has the RS-232 BIOS built-in by default without the UART hardware? What happens if you type _COMINI if:
1) There's no HX-22 RS-232 interface installed
2) There's an MSX standard RS-232 interface connected to the slot-1
Too sad the MSXMEM doesn't detect in which slot this RS-232 BIOS is installed.
What happens if you type _COMINI if:
1) There's no HX-22 RS-232 interface installed
2) There's an MSX standard RS-232 interface connected to the slot-1
1) Syntax Error...
2) I can't test that by now. I would need a ROMless standard MSX RS-232. But he HX-22 and HX-33 know that the option board is installed because they check a bit controlled by CN1 ON/OFF in the option board. So without this bit... I guess the result would be also Syntax Error.
I like the Canon V-8 design a lot. Is it even smaller than the Casio PV-7 & MX-101?
It's for sure a low cost design, but a very clean and effective one in that category. The Casio PV-7 was certainly much more expensive & laborious to produce than the PV-8, and probably had the terrible keyboard to try to compensate for that. Is the keyboard of the PV-8 good?
Casio fixed their PV-7 misdoings in the later MX-10, but only on the MX-101 they seem to have reached the same level as the PV-8 in clean design and cost effectiveness to produce.
To the naked eye, Canon V-8 seems to be bigger due to its color. And indeed it is.
CASIO MX-10/MX101:
Width: 250mm
Depth: 200mm
Height: 45mm
Weight: 1000g
CASIO PV-7:
Width: 305mm
Depth: 210mm
Height: 47mm
Weight: 1525g
CASIO PV-16:
Width: 305mm
Depth: 210mm
Height: 47mm
Weight: 1555g
CANON V-8:
Width: 309mm
Depth: 214mm
Height: 43mm
Weight: 1440g
All have external DC Power Supplies, which can't provide +12/-12VDC.
The CASIO's have the Joypad, and are expandable through the docking stations KB-7 and KB-10. The Docking stations provide more two slots, +12/-12VDC and standard printer port. The SOUNDIN pins of the extra slots are connected to the mixer of the AUDIO output.
The SOUNDIN pin of slot 1 of model PV-7 is not connected, meaning you can't get SCC sound from this slot. I've made a hack to correct this adding a resistor to the PCB.
PV-7 and the MX models need the FA-32 adapter to use cassete recorder.
Also, I found that all PV-7 and PV-16 machines I took needed a keyboard membrane reactivation with graphite. This not happens with the MX, though.
The Keyboard of Canon V-8 is very good and works perfectly without keys failing or stucking. But it is totally parallell with the table, just like in modern notebooks.
Bonus for you all: Small MSX weight comparison.
LOL!
Regarding CASIO MX-101. Its' double-sided PCB.
That's why I buy every MSX computers I can
Because almost nobody opens them and takes good pictures !
I forgot to mention I had this set of pictures of Toshiba HX-22 Japanese.
I made them long ago, but I forgot to upload.
Man, I am really very high on caffeine today oO
I'd like to see a list of all these Toshiba TCX-xxxx chips with a description of what exactly they are doing...
Has anybody already tried to contact Toshiba support, to see if they can disclose the information about these chips, after 30 years ? Maybe Hitachi as well ?
Maybe some of you still work in the hardware industry and have some kind of contact ?