Wiki editing discussion

Page 57/85
50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62

By NYYRIKKI

Enlighted (5588)

NYYRIKKI's picture

13-02-2020, 16:23

About MSX-DOS page...

When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5675)

mars2000you's picture

13-02-2020, 17:19

NYYRIKKI wrote:

About MSX-DOS page...

When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.

Fixed..... Check if it's OK. I don't think it's possible on such an introduction page to give more details. Personally, i think the details about Nextor should be on an apart page, so you can guess what I mean about the MSX-DOS 2 part.... Still WIP and more pages required for all the nuances.

By DRomero

Expert (125)

DRomero's picture

13-02-2020, 17:24

Sorry, don't like to sound pedant or anything like that, but why the naming of MSX external programs as extension programs?

I have used all my live MS-DOS since 3.22 and all the commands that are not in the interpreter (command.com) are called external DOS commands, in documentation, books, etc, so why change their name?

I know that maybe, by logic, external MSX-DOS programs that are not in the command.com core maybe they are like extensions of the DOS, but if you look at documentation, they are called external DOS/MSX-DOS commands since the beginning of time, changing the name convention can be a little confusing.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5675)

mars2000you's picture

13-02-2020, 17:32

Excuse me, but you have missed a part of the discussion. See what I've decided with Nyyrikki at 13:27 (European time).

By DRomero

Expert (125)

DRomero's picture

13-02-2020, 18:25

Yeah sorry mars, I noticed after I post my message but I wasn't able to edit/modify or delete my own post.

Regards.

By rderooy

Paladin (683)

rderooy's picture

14-02-2020, 11:43

@Mars2000you. Your acting like a small child. Nobody gets to touch your toys or you have a tantrum.

Do you think other enjoy it when they add stuff and you just delete everything? Grow up!

Or should the wiki be renamed to " Mars2000you's Wiki" and made read-only for all others? Perhaps that way you can he happy.

By gdx

Prophet (3670)

gdx's picture

14-02-2020, 11:49

Why not put external and internal commands on the same page?

mars2000you wrote:
NYYRIKKI wrote:

About MSX-DOS page...

When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.

Fixed..... Check if it's OK.

Not fixed. Disk-ROM (Kernel), COMMANDx.COM, MSX-DOS.SYS are not differentiated.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5675)

mars2000you's picture

14-02-2020, 11:51

gdx wrote:

Why not put external and internal commands on the same page?

mars2000you wrote:
NYYRIKKI wrote:

About MSX-DOS page...

When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.

Fixed..... Check if it's OK.

Not fixed. Disk-ROM (Kernel), COMMANDx.COM, MSX-DOS.SYS are not differentiated.

If you quote me, don't remove the part that seems to annoy you, it's unfair

Quote:

I don't think it's possible on such an introduction page to give more details. Personally, i think the details about Nextor should be on an apart page, so you can guess what I mean about the MSX-DOS 2 part.... Still WIP and more pages required for all the nuances.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5675)

mars2000you's picture

14-02-2020, 11:55

rderooy wrote:

@Mars2000you. Your acting like a small child. Nobody gets to touch your toys or you have a tantrum.

Do you think other enjoy it when they add stuff and you just delete everything? Grow up!

Or should the wiki be renamed to " Mars2000you's Wiki" and made read-only for all others? Perhaps that way you can he happy.

Then stop to ignore Nyyrikki remarks about 2.4x versions and PATH ...... I wanted to check that before re-adding the DOS 2 commands. Too difficult to understand, I guess?

By gdx

Prophet (3670)

gdx's picture

14-02-2020, 11:56

mars2000you wrote:

If you quote me, don't remove the part that seems to annoy you, it's unfair

What I removed does not change the reason for my remark.

Page 57/85
50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62