Guyver800 on Geenstijl.tv

Page 4/5
1 | 2 | 3 | | 5

Par Samor

Paragon (2029)

Portrait de Samor

10-08-2012, 19:34

I also agree with Fixato's post, I hope we can finally get over all that too (Actually, I thought we were).

Par HansO

Paladin (672)

Portrait de HansO

12-08-2012, 19:24

@Fixato
Ok, I have expressed my opinion, indeed based on past experience with that person, that I will not support him and the organisation he is now part of.

Fixato now has answered this with: tasteless, flame, stupid, useless discussions, dragging up insults and complaints and falsities from either sides by either sides. Quite frankly, it's sickening

Excuse me, but I do not read much respect in this kind of language for my right to have a personal opinion and express that freely. I have not insulted nor falsified facts, I just expressed my doubts and lack of trust in the ability of a person and the organisation he is part of a to represent me in politics.
Is this not what democracy is about, the right to give trust to some one to represent me?
If you think that this is tasteless and sickening, I feel sorry for your understanding of democracy and freedom of speech.
I guess you dont like what I said, but could you please respect my opinion without falling back on strong words in an attempt to silence me?

Par Arkhan

Champion (259)

Portrait de Arkhan

17-08-2012, 02:29

Ah, the usual cast of Anti-Guyver goons.

@HansO: Nice one-sided fail-stance on Guyver. I like how you and Meits claim you will not vote for them if Guyver is involved. That's classy. You'll let your pathetic grudge stand in the way of the bigger picture. That's defective as far as democracy is concerned. Equal rights, and all.

In the like 5 years I've known Guyver, I've found him to be an extremely helpful, friendly, and strong-willed person. The dude don't screw around.

Now, all of you naysayers, I've found to be nothing more than a bunch of petty jackasses that are too blinded by being verbally throttled in the past to have a clear picture of much of anything. Guyver's doing something cool, and you're all sitting here on the internet being lame. Especially OuchOuchBirdie. That dude's so lame he can't even post anything but backseat one liners while the rest of you feebly flail around trying to make a point.

Guyver could come up with a groundbreaking cure for cancer, and you chucklefucks would still sit back and go HE PROBABLY INVENTED CANCER IN THE FIRST PLACE, THIS IS ALL PART OF HIS VENDETTA.

Grow up. Every single time Guyver comes up on this shitty site, the same like 5 shmoes show up to run their mouths.

You got HansO, OuchOuchBirdie, Meits. I'm surprised the other goons haven't posted stupid crap yet. Snot or whatever.

Real talk.

Par HansO

Paladin (672)

Portrait de HansO

17-08-2012, 08:49

Arkfan, that is a real mature reply!

Par Arkhan

Champion (259)

Portrait de Arkhan

17-08-2012, 09:22

It's about as mature as your attitude regarding Guyver, and your purposeful mistyping of my name.

At least, I think it was on purpose.

If that's the case: LOL, your joke sucked.
If it was an accident: You suck at typing.

Par HansO

Paladin (672)

Portrait de HansO

17-08-2012, 10:51

The only reason i started visting this forum recently again is the total sale out of my MSX collection.
That is going quite well, and i will continue to post to the Trade & Collecting threads, making other MSX users happy with some rare objects and recover some of my investments.

To continue any discussion with immature and bad mouthed persons in this thread would be a waste of time.
Being polite and differ from opinion at the same time is very hard it seems. Typical and so sad, sad, sad.

Par tfh

Paragon (1813)

Portrait de tfh

17-08-2012, 11:16

/ignore Arkhan

For the Dutchies among us:

http://webwereld.nl/column/111495/pleidooi-voor-een-populist...

Par mars2000you

Enlighted (5513)

Portrait de mars2000you

17-08-2012, 14:57

Well, I can understand Dutch ... Judging a young party by criticizing just one point of its program that is not really explained is easy for journalists, making a complete program is not so easy. I like the original approach of the Pirate Party (build an anti-1984 society), but by definition, such approach can't be classified on the left side or on the right side. It means that we have a pluralistic party with always the search for consensus. Maybe it's the problem for some people, but don't make it a problem against some other people !

Par OeiOeiVogeltje

Paragon (1309)

Portrait de OeiOeiVogeltje

17-08-2012, 22:44

/ignore idiot

Par tfh

Paragon (1813)

Portrait de tfh

20-08-2012, 15:53

Page 4/5
1 | 2 | 3 | | 5