How does TriloTracker compare?
It's probably not a fair comparison, as like you mentioned, Moonblaster is quite old (though amazing for the time), and relatively very limited in its functionality and possibilities.
Let's just say that TriloTracker gives me (being a bit of an MSX composer myself) full control over the soundchips, exactly how I want it.
It would be remarkable if I didn't feel that way, as I co-designed the thing. 
An in-depth comparison would yield an unnecessarily long list. The Effects list might be relevant to have a look at.
Apart from the much larger amount of effects and commands, one of the most important differences is that, where Moonblaster offers only 1 command or statement per step, TriloTracker has a maximum of 6.
Also, having full control over the PSG is quite a factor for me.
@John: any news perhaps on the Java emulated version? 
Not really, I'm afraid. At the moment we're concentrating on getting the MSX versions done.
I will make a public beta available this weekend.
Sweeeet! Will test
Ref this on the project-page:
Later, during development, an FM version of the tracker was created. This version is only a hacked version of the origininal tracker for PSG and SCC.
How's the current FM-status compared to the two other first-class citizens, PSG and SCC?
Still extremely interested in the tt replayer. When that comes out it will be the valhalla for me. I can use trilotracker and enjoy it as well. A replayer for its files will help me so good in future projects
