When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.
When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.
Fixed..... Check if it's OK. I don't think it's possible on such an introduction page to give more details. Personally, i think the details about Nextor should be on an apart page, so you can guess what I mean about the MSX-DOS 2 part.... Still WIP and more pages required for all the nuances.
Sorry, don't like to sound pedant or anything like that, but why the naming of MSX external programs as extension programs?
I have used all my live MS-DOS since 3.22 and all the commands that are not in the interpreter (command.com) are called external DOS commands, in documentation, books, etc, so why change their name?
I know that maybe, by logic, external MSX-DOS programs that are not in the command.com core maybe they are like extensions of the DOS, but if you look at documentation, they are called external DOS/MSX-DOS commands since the beginning of time, changing the name convention can be a little confusing.
Why not put external and internal commands on the same page?
mars2000you wrote:
NYYRIKKI wrote:
About MSX-DOS page...
When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.
Fixed..... Check if it's OK.
Not fixed. Disk-ROM (Kernel), COMMANDx.COM, MSX-DOS.SYS are not differentiated.
Why not put external and internal commands on the same page?
mars2000you wrote:
NYYRIKKI wrote:
About MSX-DOS page...
When talking about MSX-DOS2 versions there seem to be MSXDOS2.SYS, COMMAND2.COM and Disk ROM versions happily mixed together... I think there should be some sense made to this part.
Fixed..... Check if it's OK.
Not fixed. Disk-ROM (Kernel), COMMANDx.COM, MSX-DOS.SYS are not differentiated.
If you quote me, don't remove the part that seems to annoy you, it's unfair
Quote:
I don't think it's possible on such an introduction page to give more details. Personally, i think the details about Nextor should be on an apart page, so you can guess what I mean about the MSX-DOS 2 part.... Still WIP and more pages required for all the nuances.
@Mars2000you. Your acting like a small child. Nobody gets to touch your toys or you have a tantrum.
Do you think other enjoy it when they add stuff and you just delete everything? Grow up!
Or should the wiki be renamed to " Mars2000you's Wiki" and made read-only for all others? Perhaps that way you can he happy.
Then stop to ignore Nyyrikki remarks about 2.4x versions and PATH ...... I wanted to check that before re-adding the DOS 2 commands. Too difficult to understand, I guess?
